# ExecutionException: Invalid BIND on dates SWRL rule honored by Protege

**URL:** <https://community.stardog.com/t/executionexception-invalid-bind-on-dates-swrl-rule-honored-by-protege/1876>\
**Category:** Support\
**Created:** [September 4, 2019, 3:42pm UTC](https://community.stardog.com/t/executionexception-invalid-bind-on-dates-swrl-rule-honored-by-protege/1876 "2019-09-04T15:42:47Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 13

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mamillerpa](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex030/user_avatar/community.stardog.com/mamillerpa/32/515_2.png) [@mamillerpa](https://community.stardog.com/u/mamillerpa)\
**Post date:** [September 10, 2019, 2:22pm UTC](https://community.stardog.com/t/executionexception-invalid-bind-on-dates-swrl-rule-honored-by-protege/1876/13 "2019-09-10T14:22:13Z")

</div>

@evren OK, I'm on board with the Stardog rule syntax! But now I'm having a performance problem.

I started a new post: [Same individual filter in toy dataset: 5 seconds -\> 5 minutes](https://community.stardog.com/t/same-individual-filter-in-toy-dataset-5-seconds-5-minutes/1886)

thanks,  
Mark

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.stardog.com/t/executionexception-invalid-bind-on-dates-swrl-rule-honored-by-protege/1876)._