# Federated recursive query

**URL:** <https://community.stardog.com/t/federated-recursive-query/2105>\
**Category:** Feature Request\
**Created:** [November 20, 2019, 10:38am UTC](https://community.stardog.com/t/federated-recursive-query/2105 "2019-11-20T10:38:23Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lavhal](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/f9ae1b/32.png) [@lavhal](https://community.stardog.com/u/lavhal)\
**Post date:** [November 22, 2019, 9:21am UTC](https://community.stardog.com/t/federated-recursive-query/2105/5 "2019-11-22T09:21:48Z")

</div>

Jess,

I already tried with `VALUES` list, but unfortunately (as you also said) that doesn't work for this scenario, since the WEB API accepts only one value per time. There is a possibility to write code some work on top of the the SPARQL interpreter but that wouldn't be a clean solution that we are looking for.

Anyway, could you post here the optimization that you mentioned using VALUES list?  
-\> I would like to compare with the way how I am doing it, maybe there is something that can help temporarily.

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.stardog.com/t/federated-recursive-query/2105)._