MadsHolten
(Mads Holten Rasmussen)
1
Can it really be that stardog doesn't support the Turtle syntax for collections?
For example
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix ex: <http://example.org/test#> .
ex:SolarSystem ex:planets (
ex:Mercury ex:Venus ex:Earth ex:Mars ex:Jupiter ex:Saturn
) .
Instead of
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix ex: <http://example.org/test#> .
ex:SolarSystem ex:planets [
rdf:first ex:Mercury ; rdf:rest [
rdf:first ex:Venus ; rdf:rest [
rdf:first ex:Earth ; rdf:rest [
rdf:first ex:Mars ; rdf:rest [
rdf:first ex:Jupiter ; rdf:rest [
rdf:first ex:Saturn ;
rdf:rest rdf:nil
]
]
]
]
]
] .
Are you having a problem that leads you to belive that it doesn’t? Can you include error messages, log output, stardog version, etc?
1 Like
MadsHolten
(Mads Holten Rasmussen)
3
Yes. I tried using it in a construct query without any luck. Maybe this is the reason?
lorenz_b
(Lorenz B.)
4
I guess it would be much easier to help you if you provide sample data, the query and the expected result resp. what does not work.
system
(system)
Closed
5
This topic was automatically closed 14 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.