For querying stardog there are 2 options:
- Use the standard SPARQL endpoint https://:5820//query
- Use the SNARL programming interface through the Java API
What are the pros/cons of both methods, would there be a performance benefit or anything else with using SNARL over SPARQL ?
Looking forward to your repsonse
There are actually a few other ways to query Stardog, however they all ultimately wrap some version of the HTTP API. I suppose, therefore, there is possibly a performance hit when using the APIs versus sending an HTTP call directly, but it would be negligible.
okay, so in general for pure query operations a direct http sparql call benefits from simplicity ( no elaborate dependencies ) where the performance tradeoff can be neglected.
Good to know!
This topic was automatically closed 14 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.